Friday, May 29

Celebrating our 1,100,100 visits

Much like the temperature in Phoenix, our sitemeter has reached the triple digit mark! (But it's a DRY heat)
The century mark.
The centennial.
"Four", for those of you TRON geeks converting from binary to decimal. You know, Jeff Bridges seemed nice, but what was up Bruce Boxleitner's ass? But I digest...

We want to thank all of our many, many devoted fans, and guilt them like a Jewish grandmother for not commenting more on our posts.
"What, you're too busy to cawl every once in a while?
"I kid, I kid!" ,"Love my bubbies!"
"Come over for Saturday nosh,... have some Lox & Bagels".
Love & Knishes
-e

Tuesday, May 26

This Just In...

CA Supreme Court Sides with Pres Obama on Gay Marriage

In a ruling Tuesday widely hailed as a significant endorsement of President Obama's long-standing position, the Supreme Court of California ruled in a narrow 6 to 1 decision that Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment defining a valid marriage in California as being between a man and a woman, is a valid constitutional amendment defining marriage in California.

Supporters of Proposition 8 responded to the ruling by stating, "Well, duh."

The Proposition was passed narrowly by California voters in November 2008. The margin was razor thin, with 52% in favor of the amendment and 48% against. The proposition reversed an earlier California Supreme Court ruling in May of 2008. In that decision, the court ruled overwhelmingly, 4 to 3, to reverse Proposition 22, a voter initiative defining marriage as between a man and a woman that passed narrowly with 61% of the vote in 2000.

Speaking with reports, the Spokesperson for Gays said, "Obviously we are disappointed. We have been and remain opposed to the opposition to gay marriage.

"We were against Proposition 8 specifically because the issue of defining marriage is simply too important to be left in the hands of average voters, who may not fully understand the complex sociopolitical and sexoeconomical ramifications of not changing what the term marriage has meant for the last 2000 plus years."

Opponents of the proposition argued, unsuccessfully, that the constitutional amendment was not a constitutional amendment, and that the constitution could not be amended to define marriage as between a man and a woman because doing so would be unconstitutional.

Although the court decision was a setback, Gays remain optimistic. "We still have President Obama in the White House and his views on gay rights are well known and well defined. Because he has such a strong, consistent history of consistently taking strong, unwavering stands on controversial, important social issues, he represents our best opportunity to reverse the discriminatory and divisive policies of the previous administration, specifically the signing of the Defense of Marriage Act and the military's Don't Ask Don't Tell policy."

When contacted, Miss California, Carrie Prejean, responded "No Comment." But she said it with that kind of ironic tone of voice and a little smirk on her face that means "Ha! Guess I was right after all."

Other related articles of interest may be found
Here
Here
Here
Here

Sunday, May 24

Craigslist Post....

Male seeking Female(s)
About Me: Lonely Fabric Manufacturing Engineer looking to live a Bohemian Lifestyle. In touch with the earth/ Eco-friendly sorta guy.

Hobbies – Grazing, Humming, Distance Spitting

Looking For: Female(s) with long legs, neck, and nose.
Fun loving natural girls (not into shaving).

Secret Dream-
To record a Duet with my brother Kenny G.
Favorite Cologne- Eau du Merde

Thursday, May 21

The Random Rocky Picture of the Day*

House rules: you roll in the dirt, you get a bath.



*Not a daily feature

Tuesday, May 19

The Wait is Over 5/17

I was 4 years old when Captain Kirk and his crew began slumming through the galaxies. It took only 3 years (and an undesirable time slot) for the original series to burn itself out. Nevertheless, a legion of devoted fans was created, and a Cash-cow was born!

Warp forward to 2009. Can we bust the mold, remake it, and do this all over again?
In this viewer's humble opinion,... Mooooo!.

CAUTION- SLOW TO IMPULSE POWER- SPOILERS AHEAD!

This is what works and what doesn't about this latest Star Trek reincarnation.

Works- Sex appeal and a strong Ensemble. Unless you've been vacationing on Risa for the past year, you've probably noticed that the new Cast is smolderingly hot. Kirk, Uhura, Bones, Chekov, Sulu, and even Spock, reek with raw sensuality. Less so with Scotty who's function appears to be primarily comic, but let's be realistic,... he IS an Engineer!

Did someone say Pon farr?? Is that Uhuru and Spock Mack-ing on the transporter pad? Truth be known, this made me uncomfortable.

Leonard Nimoy notes that the question of Spock's extraordinary sex appeal emerged "almost any time I talked to someone in the press...I never give it a thought....to try to deal with the question of Mr. Spock as a sex symbol is silly.

Len, you're on the money. Be careful Paramount!

Works - Special Effects. To be expected in a movie of the genre. Yet,... it delivers.

Weaknesses- Temporal Story Lines "Does anybody know what time it is?"
OK, here's the secret in the sauce,... if you want to save favorite characters from the same old grind of a 1960's series, simply mix in a dash of Temporal anomaly and start re-writing your time line. This is a solution that Kirk would be proud of... albeit a "cheating" one.... more of that when you see the movie.

So, if you're long standing Trekkie, take the $7 out of your pocket and go see the movie.(... unless you're a Ferengi, in which case you'll end up waiting for a bootlegged copy about a year from now).

Engage
-e